(as of December 31, 2012)
|
MEASURED |
INDICATED |
MEASURED & INDICATED |
INFERRED |
| |
Ownership |
Tonnage |
Grade |
Contained |
Tonnage |
Grade |
Contained |
Tonnage |
Grade |
Contained |
Tonnage |
Grade |
Contained |
| Gold |
mt |
g Au/t |
moz |
mt |
g Au/t |
moz |
mt |
g Au/t |
moz |
mt |
g Au/t |
moz |
| Alumbrera |
37.5% |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
| Camino Rojo |
100.0% |
|
|
- |
23.14 |
0.76 |
0.57 |
23.14 |
0.76 |
0.57 |
0.64 |
0.27 |
0.01 |
| Cerro Blanco |
100.0% |
|
|
- |
2.52 |
15.64 |
1.27 |
2.52 |
15.64 |
1.27 |
1.35 |
15.31 |
0.67 |
| Cerro Negro |
100.0% |
- |
- |
- |
5.12 |
3.12 |
0.51 |
5.12 |
3.12 |
0.51 |
5.32 |
4.81 |
0.82 |
| Cochenour |
100.0% |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
9.05 |
11.18 |
3.25 |
| Dee |
40.0% |
|
|
- |
9.90 |
1.53 |
0.49 |
9.90 |
1.53 |
0.49 |
17.01 |
0.51 |
0.28 |
| El Morro |
70.0% |
3.89 |
0.48 |
0.06 |
19.31 |
0.39 |
0.24 |
23.20 |
0.40 |
0.30 |
472.19 |
0.25 |
3.85 |
| El Sauzal |
100.0% |
1.45 |
0.92 |
0.04 |
0.70 |
1.51 |
0.03 |
2.15 |
1.11 |
0.08 |
0.04 |
1.35 |
0.00 |
| Eleonore |
100.0% |
0.14 |
10.01 |
0.04 |
1.23 |
11.05 |
0.44 |
1.36 |
10.95 |
0.48 |
12.25 |
10.60 |
4.17 |
| Los Filos |
100.0% |
9.61 |
1.90 |
0.59 |
61.41 |
0.89 |
1.76 |
71.02 |
1.03 |
2.35 |
239.18 |
0.84 |
6.49 |
| Marigold |
66.7% |
1.05 |
0.48 |
0.02 |
29.34 |
0.42 |
0.40 |
30.39 |
0.42 |
0.42 |
54.17 |
0.43 |
0.74 |
| Marlin |
100.0% |
0.10 |
2.88 |
0.01 |
0.36 |
2.66 |
0.03 |
0.46 |
2.71 |
0.04 |
0.44 |
4.51 |
0.06 |
| Musselwhite |
100.0% |
0.11 |
4.84 |
0.02 |
0.35 |
5.88 |
0.07 |
0.46 |
5.63 |
0.08 |
4.99 |
5.72 |
0.92 |
| Noche Buena |
100.0% |
|
|
- |
71.75 |
0.42 |
0.96 |
71.75 |
0.42 |
0.96 |
17.67 |
0.42 |
0.24 |
| Penasquito Heap Leach |
100.0% |
3.68 |
0.06 |
0.01 |
21.77 |
0.07 |
0.05 |
25.45 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
50.66 |
0.17 |
0.28 |
| Penasquito Mill |
100.0% |
125.56 |
0.17 |
0.67 |
451.43 |
0.19 |
2.74 |
576.98 |
0.18 |
3.41 |
126.63 |
0.20 |
0.83 |
| Porcupine |
100.0% |
37.20 |
1.25 |
1.50 |
132.02 |
1.16 |
4.94 |
169.22 |
1.18 |
6.43 |
18.85 |
1.95 |
1.18 |
| Pueblo Viejo |
40.0% |
2.61 |
2.47 |
0.21 |
78.17 |
2.13 |
5.36 |
80.78 |
2.14 |
5.57 |
6.57 |
2.18 |
0.46 |
| Red Lake |
100.0% |
1.47 |
18.36 |
0.87 |
3.22 |
14.07 |
1.46 |
4.69 |
15.41 |
2.32 |
3.19 |
16.11 |
1.65 |
| San Nicolas |
21.0% |
|
|
- |
19.26 |
0.46 |
0.28 |
19.26 |
0.46 |
0.28 |
2.28 |
0.26 |
0.02 |
| Wharf |
100.0% |
6.98 |
0.84 |
0.19 |
1.62 |
0.98 |
0.05 |
8.60 |
0.87 |
0.24 |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Totals |
|
|
|
4.21 |
|
|
21.65 |
|
|
25.86 |
|
|
25.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Silver |
mt |
g Ag/t |
moz |
mt |
g Ag/t |
moz |
mt |
g Ag/t |
moz |
mt |
g Ag/t |
moz |
| Camino Rojo |
100.0% |
- |
|
- |
23.14 |
14.94 |
11.11 |
23.14 |
14.94 |
11.11 |
0.64 |
4.53 |
0.09 |
| Cerro Blanco |
100.0% |
- |
|
- |
2.52 |
72.00 |
5.83 |
2.52 |
72.00 |
5.83 |
1.35 |
59.60 |
2.59 |
| Cerro Negro |
100.0% |
- |
|
- |
5.12 |
22.95 |
3.78 |
5.12 |
22.95 |
3.78 |
5.32 |
34.35 |
5.87 |
| Dee |
40.0% |
- |
|
- |
9.90 |
7.42 |
2.36 |
9.90 |
7.42 |
2.36 |
17.01 |
2.38 |
1.30 |
| Los Filos |
100.0% |
9.61 |
8.48 |
2.62 |
61.41 |
6.76 |
13.35 |
71.02 |
7.00 |
15.97 |
239.18 |
6.04 |
46.47 |
| Marlin |
100.0% |
0.10 |
108.23 |
0.35 |
0.36 |
100.69 |
1.15 |
0.46 |
102.36 |
1.50 |
0.44 |
210.78 |
3.01 |
| Noche Buena |
100.0% |
- |
|
- |
71.75 |
14.06 |
32.44 |
71.75 |
14.06 |
32.44 |
17.67 |
13.92 |
7.91 |
| Penasquito Heap Leach |
100.0% |
3.68 |
5.01 |
0.59 |
21.77 |
4.19 |
2.93 |
25.45 |
4.31 |
3.52 |
50.66 |
1.61 |
2.62 |
| Penasquito Mill |
100.0% |
125.56 |
14.44 |
58.29 |
451.43 |
13.12 |
190.43 |
576.98 |
13.41 |
248.72 |
126.63 |
9.13 |
37.17 |
| Pueblo Viejo |
40.0% |
2.61 |
15.20 |
1.28 |
78.17 |
11.82 |
29.71 |
80.78 |
11.93 |
30.99 |
6.57 |
14.32 |
3.02 |
| San Nicolas |
21.0% |
- |
|
- |
19.26 |
26.70 |
16.53 |
19.26 |
26.70 |
16.53 |
2.28 |
17.40 |
1.27 |
| Wharf |
100.0% |
6.98 |
4.73 |
1.06 |
1.62 |
4.12 |
0.21 |
8.60 |
4.62 |
1.28 |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Totals |
|
|
|
64.19 |
|
|
309.85 |
|
|
374.04 |
|
|
111.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Copper |
mt |
% Cu |
mlbs Cu |
mt |
% Cu |
mlbs Cu |
mt |
% Cu |
mlbs Cu |
mt |
% Cu |
mlbs Cu |
| Alumbrera |
37.5% |
- |
|
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
0.00% |
- |
- |
|
- |
| El Morro |
70.0% |
3.89 |
0.57% |
49 |
19.31 |
0.51% |
216 |
23.20 |
0.52% |
264 |
472.19 |
0.35% |
3,689 |
| Pueblo Viejo |
40.0% |
2.61 |
0.12% |
7 |
78.17 |
0.09% |
157 |
80.78 |
0.09% |
164 |
6.57 |
0.07% |
11 |
| San Nicolas |
21.0% |
- |
|
- |
19.26 |
1.24% |
527 |
19.26 |
1.24% |
527 |
2.28 |
1.24% |
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Totals |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
899 |
|
|
955 |
|
|
3,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Lead |
mt |
% Pb |
mlbs Pb |
mt |
% Pb |
mlbs Pb |
mt |
% Pb |
mlbs Pb |
mt |
% Pb |
mlbs Pb |
| Penasquito Mill |
100.0% |
125.56 |
0.15% |
426 |
451.43 |
0.13% |
1,275 |
576.98 |
0.13% |
1,700 |
126.63 |
0.14% |
382 |
| Camino Rojo |
100.0% |
0.00 |
0.23% |
- |
23.14 |
0.17% |
89 |
23.14 |
0.17% |
89 |
0.64 |
0.08% |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Totals |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
1,364 |
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Zinc |
mt |
% Zn |
mlbs Zn |
mt |
% Zn |
mlbs Zn |
mt |
% Zn |
mlbs Zn |
mt |
% Zn |
mlbs Zn |
| Penasquito Mill |
100.0% |
125.56 |
0.39% |
1,083 |
451.43 |
0.34% |
3,410 |
576.98 |
0.35% |
4,493 |
126.63 |
0.26% |
736 |
| Camino Rojo |
100.0% |
0.00 |
0.37% |
- |
23.14 |
0.37% |
189 |
23.14 |
0.37% |
189 |
0.64 |
0.25% |
4 |
| San Nicolas |
21.0% |
0.00 |
|
- |
19.26 |
1.68% |
713 |
19.26 |
1.68% |
713 |
2.28 |
0.97% |
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Totals |
|
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
4,312 |
|
|
5,395 |
|
|
788 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Numbers may not add up due to rounding.
Goldcorp December 31, 2012 Reserve and Resource Reporting Notes:
-
All Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources have been calculated in accordance with the standards of the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum and National Instrument 43-101, or the AusIMM JORC equivalent.
-
All Mineral Resources are reported exclusive of Mineral Reserves.
-
Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
-
Reserves and Resources are reported as of December 31, 2012, with the following conditions or exceptions:
- Reserves and Resources for Pueblo Viejo are as per information provided by Barrick Gold Corporation.
- Reserves and Resources for Dee are as per information provided by Barrick Gold Corporation.
- Resources for San Nicolas are as per information provided by Teck Resources Limited (2012 Study).
- Mineral Reserves are estimated using appropriate recovery rates and US$ commodity prices of $1,350 per ounce of gold, $24 per ounce of silver, $3.00 per pound of copper, $0.80 per pound of lead, and $0.85 per pound of zinc, unless otherwise noted below:
- Alumbrera – $1,400/oz gold and $3.20/lb copper
- Pueblo Viejo, Dee – $1,500/oz gold, $28/oz silver, $3.00/lb copper
- Mineral Resources are estimated using US$ commodity prices of $1,500 per ounce of gold, $27 per ounce of silver, $3.50 per pound of copper, $0.95 per pound of lead, and $0.95 per pound of zinc, unless otherwise noted below:
- Pueblo Viejo, Dee – $1,650/oz gold, $30/oz silver, $3.50/lb copper
- San Nicolas – $1,000/oz gold, $16.00/oz silver, $2.70/lb copper, $1.00/lb zinc
Cautionary note to United States investors concerning estimates of measured, indicated and inferred resources:
These tables use the terms “Measured”, “Indicated” and “Inferred” Resources. United States investors are advised that while such terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. “Inferred Mineral Resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or other economic studies. United States investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of Measured or Indicated Mineral Resources will ever be converted into Mineral Reserves. United States investors are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.
Scientific and technical information was reviewed and approved by Maryse Belanger, P.Geo., Senior Vice-President, Technical Services for Goldcorp, and a “qualified person” as defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”).
For a more detailed description of the key assumptions, parameters and methods used in calculating Goldcorp’s Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources, please refer to Goldcorp’s most recently filed Annual Information Form/Form 40F filed with Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.